China Criticizes New US AI Export Control Measures, Pledges to Protect Its Interests
The Ministry of Commerce denounces US rules restricting AI technology exports, citing impacts on global trade and innovation.
China's Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) has issued a strong rebuke against the United States' newly introduced export control rules on artificial intelligence (AI) technology.
This response comes in the wake of the Biden Administration's announcement of an Interim Final Rule on AI Diffusion, aimed at tightening restrictions on exports of AI chips and technologies.
MOFCOM warns that these measures could significantly damage international business interests and disrupt global economic and trade stability.
The US government has outlined an agenda to cap exports of AI chips to various nations, while allowing unrestricted access to its closest allies.
Meanwhile, China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea remain barred from receiving such technologies, as reported by Reuters.
This decision has drawn sharp criticism from Chinese officials who argue that the measures extend US jurisdiction excessively and hinder legitimate international trade practices.
US technology sectors have echoed China's concerns.
Major industry players, such as Nvidia and Oracle, have voiced their dissatisfaction, branding the regulations as potentially damaging to innovation and economic growth.
Nvidia emphasized that the measures could undermine global competitiveness, affecting routine computing applications worldwide, while Oracle's Ken Glueck described the new rules as overly regulatory, potentially ceding global AI and GPU markets to Chinese companies.
The rules are expected to impact the distribution of advanced graphics processing units (GPUs), essential components in AI model training platforms, with exemptions primarily benefiting the US's strategic allies like Japan, Britain, and South Korea.
Nonetheless, countries including Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE will face new quota limits on US technology imports.
Industry analysts have expressed concern over the broader implications of the US's approach.
Ma Jihua, a telecom industry expert from China, highlighted that these restrictions could precipitate a downturn in the American semiconductor market.
By narrowing export channels, US manufacturers may see diminished global sales, ultimately affecting upstream companies with historical advantages in the sector.
The MOFCOM has pledged to take countermeasures to protect China's rightful interests, asserting that such unilateral export controls violate international trade rules and obstruct technological progress.
This ongoing conflict underscores the intricate interplay of economic strategy and national security in global technology markets.
As nations navigate the complexities of international trade and technological advancement, the repercussions of these new US export controls on AI technologies remain a focal point for diplomatic and commercial discourse across the globe.
This response comes in the wake of the Biden Administration's announcement of an Interim Final Rule on AI Diffusion, aimed at tightening restrictions on exports of AI chips and technologies.
MOFCOM warns that these measures could significantly damage international business interests and disrupt global economic and trade stability.
The US government has outlined an agenda to cap exports of AI chips to various nations, while allowing unrestricted access to its closest allies.
Meanwhile, China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea remain barred from receiving such technologies, as reported by Reuters.
This decision has drawn sharp criticism from Chinese officials who argue that the measures extend US jurisdiction excessively and hinder legitimate international trade practices.
US technology sectors have echoed China's concerns.
Major industry players, such as Nvidia and Oracle, have voiced their dissatisfaction, branding the regulations as potentially damaging to innovation and economic growth.
Nvidia emphasized that the measures could undermine global competitiveness, affecting routine computing applications worldwide, while Oracle's Ken Glueck described the new rules as overly regulatory, potentially ceding global AI and GPU markets to Chinese companies.
The rules are expected to impact the distribution of advanced graphics processing units (GPUs), essential components in AI model training platforms, with exemptions primarily benefiting the US's strategic allies like Japan, Britain, and South Korea.
Nonetheless, countries including Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE will face new quota limits on US technology imports.
Industry analysts have expressed concern over the broader implications of the US's approach.
Ma Jihua, a telecom industry expert from China, highlighted that these restrictions could precipitate a downturn in the American semiconductor market.
By narrowing export channels, US manufacturers may see diminished global sales, ultimately affecting upstream companies with historical advantages in the sector.
The MOFCOM has pledged to take countermeasures to protect China's rightful interests, asserting that such unilateral export controls violate international trade rules and obstruct technological progress.
This ongoing conflict underscores the intricate interplay of economic strategy and national security in global technology markets.
As nations navigate the complexities of international trade and technological advancement, the repercussions of these new US export controls on AI technologies remain a focal point for diplomatic and commercial discourse across the globe.
AI Disclaimer: An advanced artificial intelligence (AI) system generated the content of this page on its own. This innovative technology conducts extensive research from a variety of reliable sources, performs rigorous fact-checking and verification, cleans up and balances biased or manipulated content, and presents a minimal factual summary that is just enough yet essential for you to function as an informed and educated citizen. Please keep in mind, however, that this system is an evolving technology, and as a result, the article may contain accidental inaccuracies or errors. We urge you to help us improve our site by reporting any inaccuracies you find using the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page. Your helpful feedback helps us improve our system and deliver more precise content. When you find an article of interest here, please look for the full and extensive coverage of this topic in traditional news sources, as they are written by professional journalists that we try to support, not replace. We appreciate your understanding and assistance.
